Brain death determination in patients with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic study to address the Harlequin syndrome.

PURPOSE: The Harlequin syndrome may occur in patients treated with venoarterial extracorporal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), in whom blood from the left ventricle and the ECMO system supply different parts of the body with different paCO2-levels. The purpose of this study was to compare two variants of paCO2-analysis to account for the Harlequin syndrome during apnea testing (AT) in brain death (BD) determination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (median age 48 years, 26-76 years; male n = 19) with VA-ECMO treatment were included who underwent BD determination. In variant 1, simultaneous arterial blood gas (ABG) samples were drawn from the right and the left radial artery. In variant 2, simultaneous ABG samples were drawn from the right radial artery and the postoxygenator ECMO circuit. Differences in paCO2-levels were analysed for both variants. RESULTS: At the start of AT, median paCO2-difference between right and left radial artery (variant 1) was 0.90 mmHg (95%-confidence intervall [CI]: 0.7-1.3 mmHg). Median paCO2-difference between right radial artery and postoxygenator ECMO circuit (variant 2) was 3.3 mmHg (95%-CI: 1.5-6.0 mmHg) and thereby significantly higher compared to variant 1 (p = 0.001). At the end of AT, paCO2-difference according to variant 1 remained unchanged with 1.1 mmHg (95%-CI: 0.9-1.8 mmHg). In contrast, paCO2-difference according to variant 2 increased to 9.9 mmHg (95%-CI: 3.5-19.2 mmHg; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous paCO2-analysis from right and left distal arterial lines is the method of choice to reduce the risk of adverse effects (e.g. severe respiratory acidosis) while performing AT in VA-ECMO patients during BD determination.

Patient-Centered Outcomes in a Randomized Trial Investigating a Multimodal Prevention Program After Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke: The INSPiRE-TMS Trial.

BACKGROUND: The INSPiRE-TMS trial (Intensified Secondary Prevention Intending a Reduction of Recurrent Events in Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke Patients) investigated effects of a multicomponent support program in patients with nondisabling stroke or transient ischemic attack. Although secondary prevention targets were achieved more frequently in the intensified care group, no significant differences were seen in rates of recurrent major vascular events. Here, we present the effects on prespecified patient-centered outcomes. METHODS: In a multicenter trial, we randomized patients with modifiable risk factors either to the intensified or conventional care alone program. Intensified care was provided by stroke specialists and used feedback and motivational interviewing strategies (≥8 outpatient visits over 2 years) aiming to improve adherence to secondary prevention targets. We measured physical fitness, disability, cognitive function and health-related quality of life by stair-climbing test, modified Rankin Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and European Quality of Life 5 Dimension 3 Level during the first 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Of 2072 patients (mean age: 67.4years, 34% female) assessed for the primary outcome, patient-centered outcomes were collected in 1,771 patients (877 intensified versus 894 conventional care group). Physical fitness improved more in the intensified care group (mean between-group difference in power (Watt): 24.5 after 1 year (95% CI, 5.5-43.5); 36.1 after 2 years (95% CI, 13.1-59.7) and 29.6 (95% CI, 2.0-57.3 after 3 years). At 1 year, there was a significant shift in ordinal regression analysis of modified Rankin Scale in favor of the intensified care group (common odds ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.03-1.47]) but not after 2 (odds ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.96-1.41]) or 3 years (odds ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.95-1.43]) of follow-up. However, Montreal Cognitive Assessment and European Quality of Life 5 Dimension scores showed no improvement in the intensified intervention arm after 1, 2, or 3 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients of the intensified care program group had slightly better results for physical fitness and modified Rankin Scale after 1 year, but none of the other patient-centered outcomes was significantly improved. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01586702.

COVID-19 and Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Case Series, Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) profoundly impacts hemostasis and microvasculature. In the light of the dilemma between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, in the present paper, we systematically investigate the prevalence, mortality, radiological subtypes, and clinical characteristics of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a systematic review of the literature by screening the PubMed database and included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and concomitant ICH. We performed a pooled analysis, including a prospectively collected cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients with ICH, as part of the PANDEMIC registry (Pooled Analysis of Neurologic Disorders Manifesting in Intensive Care of COVID-19). RESULTS: Our literature review revealed a total of 217 citations. After the selection process, 79 studies and a total of 477 patients were included. The median age was 58.8 years. A total of 23.3% of patients experienced the critical stage of COVID-19, 62.7% of patients were on anticoagulation and 27.5% of the patients received ECMO. The prevalence of ICH was at 0.85% and the mortality at 52.18%, respectively. CONCLUSION: ICH in COVID-19 patients is rare, but it has a very poor prognosis. Different subtypes of ICH seen in COVID-19, support the assumption of heterogeneous and multifaceted pathomechanisms contributing to ICH in COVID-19. Further clinical and pathophysiological investigations are warranted to resolve the conflict between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in the future.

Viscoelastic testing reveals normalization of the coagulation profile 12 weeks after severe COVID-19.

COVID 19 is associated with a hypercoagulable state and frequent thromboembolic complications. For how long this acquired abnormality lasts potentially requiring preventive measures, such as anticoagulation remains to be delineated. We used viscoelastic rotational thrombelastometry (ROTEM) in a single center cohort of 13 critical ill patients and performed follow up examinations three months after discharge from ICU. We found clear signs of a hypercoagulable state due to severe hypofibrinolysis and a high rate of thromboembolic complications during the phase of acute illness. Three month follow up revealed normalization of the initial coagulation abnormality and no evidence of venous thrombosis in all thirteen patients. In our cohort the coagulation profile was completely normalized three months after COVID-19. Based on these findings, discontinuation of anticoagulation can be discussed in patients with complete venous reperfusion.

High frequency of cerebrospinal fluid autoantibodies in COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 intensive care patients can present with neurological syndromes, usually in the absence of SARS-CoV-2 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The recent finding of some virus-neutralizing antibodies cross-reacting with brain tissue suggests the possible involvement of specific autoimmunity. DESIGN: Blood and CSF samples from eleven critically ill COVID-19 patients presenting with unexplained neurological symptoms including myoclonus, oculomotor disturbance, delirium, dystonia and epileptic seizures, were analyzed for anti-neuronal and anti-glial autoantibodies. RESULTS: Using cell-based assays and indirect immunofluorescence on unfixed murine brain sections, all patients showed anti-neuronal autoantibodies in serum or CSF. Antigens included intracellular and neuronal surface proteins, such as Yo or NMDA receptor, but also various specific undetermined epitopes, reminiscent of the brain tissue binding observed with certain human monoclonal SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. These included vessel endothelium, astrocytic proteins and neuropil of basal ganglia, hippocampus or olfactory bulb. CONCLUSION: The high frequency of autoantibodies targeting the brain in the absence of other explanations suggests a causal relationship to clinical symptoms, in particular to hyperexcitability (myoclonus, seizures). Several underlying autoantigens and their potential molecular mimicry with SARS-CoV-2 still await identification. However, autoantibodies may already now explain some aspects of multi-organ disease in COVID-19 and can guide immunotherapy in selected cases.

A support programme for secondary prevention in patients with transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (INSPiRE-TMS): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with recent stroke or transient ischaemic attack are at high risk for a further vascular event, possibly leading to permanent disability or death. Although evidence-based treatments for secondary prevention are available, many patients do not achieve recommended behavioural modifications and pharmaceutical prevention targets in the long-term. We aimed to investigate whether a support programme for enhanced secondary prevention can reduce the frequency of recurrent vascular events. METHODS: INSPiRE-TMS was an open-label, multicentre, international randomised controlled trial done at seven German hospitals with acute stroke units and a Danish stroke centre. Patients with non-disabling stroke or transient ischaemic attack within 2 weeks from study enrolment and at least one modifiable risk factor (ie, arterial hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, or smoking) were included. Computerised randomisation was used to allocate patients (1:1) either to the support programme in addition to conventional care or to conventional care alone. The support programme used feedback and motivational interviewing strategies with eight outpatient visits over 2 years aiming to improve adherence to secondary prevention targets. The primary outcome was the composite of major vascular events consisting of stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and vascular death, assessed in the intention-to-treat population (all patients who underwent randomisation, did not withdraw study participation, and had at least one follow-up). Outcomes were assessed at annual follow-ups using time-to-first-event analysis. All-cause death was monitored as a safety outcome. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01586702. FINDINGS: From Aug 22, 2011, to Oct 30, 2017, we enrolled 2098 patients. Of those, 1048 (50·0%) were randomly assigned to the support programme group and 1050 (50·0%) patients were assigned to the conventional care group. 1030 (98·3%) patients in the support group and 1042 (99·2%) patients in the conventional care group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The mean age of analysed participants was 67·4 years and 700 (34%) were women. After a mean follow-up of 3·6 years, the primary outcome of major vascular events had occurred in 163 (15·8%) of 1030 patients of the support programme group and in 175 (16·8%) of 1042 patients of the conventional care group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·75-1·14). Total major vascular event numbers were 209 for the support programme group and 225 for the conventional care group (incidence rate ratio 0·93, 95% CI 0·77-1·12; p=0·46) and all-cause death occurred in 73 (7·1%) patients in the support programme group and 85 (8·2%) patients in the conventional care group (HR 0·85, 0·62-1·17). More patients in the support programme group achieved secondary prevention targets (eg, in 1-year-follow-up 52% vs 42% [p<0·0001] for blood pressure, 62% vs 54% [p=0·0010] for LDL, 33% vs 19% [p<0·0001] for physical activity, and 51% vs 34% [p=0·0010] for smoking cessation). INTERPRETATION: Provision of an intensified secondary prevention programme in patients with non-disabling stroke or transient ischaemic attack was associated with improved achievement of secondary prevention targets but did not lead to a significantly lower rate of major vascular events. Further research is needed to investigate the effects of support programmes in selected patients who do not achieve secondary prevention targets soon after discharge. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Pfizer, and German Stroke Foundation.

Telemedical assessment of optic nerve head and retina in patients after recent minor stroke or TIA.

The aim of the study is to telemedically assess the prevalence of simple optic nerve atrophy and retinal arteriolar anomalies in subjects who have had a minor stroke or TIA within 14 days, and to compare these results with an age-matched control group. By using a mobile examination unit, retinal photographs were taken with a 45° non-mydriatic colour fundus camera (KOWA NM-45, non-mydriatic-alpha) in patients who had suffered from a minor stroke or TIA within 14 days of the time of the examination. Retinal photographs were focused on the optic nerve head region. Pupils were not dilated. The documented medical history and the retinal images were stored on a server using browser independent web-based software running on PCs, tablets and smartphones. After completing the upload of the medical interview and the retinal images into the electronic patient chart, all retinal images were evaluated via telemedicine by an experienced senior consultant ophthalmologist. Age-matched normotensive, non-diabetic subjects (aged 40-89 years) who reported no systemic or ocular diseases were used as the control group. Both study groups were divided into five decades of life (40-49; 50-59; 60-69; 70-79; 80-89 years). We calculated the prevalences and the ratios of prevalences of optic nerve atrophy and retinal arteriolar anomalies between the stroke and the control group per decades of life. 139 minor stroke or TIA subjects (aged 40-89 years) and 1611 age-matched control subjects were examined. In the stroke group, we found significantly increased prevalences of optic nerve atrophy and retinal arteriolar anomalies throughout the 5th-8th decade of life when compared to age-matched controls. The prevalence of optic nerve atrophy in stroke subjects outranged the prevalence in the controls depending on age-class by a factor of 3-21. Simple optic nerve atrophy is frequent in patients who have suffered from an ischemic stroke or TIA, and it seems to indicate vascular damage, indicating the necessity for telemedically assisted assessment of the optic nerve.